SEE: Illegal coal subsidies could cost south-east European countries dearly, warns new Bankwatch study, NGOs
New investments in coal mines and power plants could cost the Western Balkans and Ukraine dearly if they fail to take into account binding rules on subsidies (State aid), according to a new briefing released today by CEE Bankwatch Network.
Practices such as preferential loans and guarantees, equity measures, long term contracts, and privatisation have been subject to strict rules under the Energy Community Treaty since it entered into force in 2006. And yet, the signatory countries are still planning new coal power plants and mines without adequate attention to State aid risks. As a result, investment projects and existing facilities could face serious problems, especially if the state is forced to recover the sum of the aid granted, according to the briefing’s authors, lawyers Peter Staviczky and Phedon Nicolaides.
Among the cases examined is the controversial plan for the Kosovo C power plant in Kosovo, which may be supported with a 20-year long-term power purchase agreement. While such contracts reduce the risk of the plant not being able to sell its electricity at a profit, they are usually considered as interfering with competition and are thus rarely allowed.
In January this year, the Serbian parliament ratified a USD 608 million loan for the Kostolac B3 power plant and the Drmno mine. For the development of the mine the state directly took a loan from the China ExIm Bank on behalf of state-owned electricity company Elektroprivreda Srbije (EPS), thus leaving EPS with no payback risks at all, and putting the company at an unjustified advantage on the market.
“South-east European governments can no longer hand out money to energy companies as they please. They need to learn the rules as soon as possible – certainly before committing to finance any more major energy projects,” said Pippa Gallop, Bankwatch’s Research Co ordinator. “In a sector where decisions have impacts lasting several decades, energy investments are highly cost-dependent and policymakers need to take all necessary steps to ensure legal certainty. State aid issues are no exception”.
“Governments not complying with State aid law requirements face serious legal risks both at national and European level, including for decisions taken long before EU accession. In some cases they may even have to recover the aid. The Energy Community countries would do well to learn from the case of Hungary, which signed long-term power purchase agreements with power plants in the mid 1990s, but was subject to a 6-year legal procedure after EU accession in 2004 followed by several lawsuits and international arbitration tribunals. Ultimately Hungary had to calculate the difference between the market price and the price it paid for the electricity under the agreements and recover the difference, plus interest,” warned Ioana Ciuta, Bankwatch’s Energy Co-ordinator.
- March 8, 2023 Calcium Carbonate Industry, Reshaping the Market Growth, Serbian supplier to match European industrial demand
- March 14, 2023 Activists call on EU to better protect nature from energy infrastructure in the Western Balkans
- March 12, 2023 Europe could be hit by similar protests against lithium mining as Serbia
- March 12, 2023 Rio Tinto will pay a fine of 15 million dollars in the USA for corruption